Zhuldyz Saulebekova
Executive Director, Almaty Air Initiative
I’m often asked how my background in technology and scaling complex organizations translates into the work we do at Almaty Air Initiative.
I did not come to this field as an environmental specialist or through traditional activism. I came to it as an executive who has spent years building systems, navigating uncertainty, and translating strategy into execution. For me, air quality is not a symbolic issue — it is a large-scale, cross-sector system challenge. And system challenges can be managed when they are approached with clarity, discipline, and the right tools.
My professional career was shaped in high-growth technology environments, where progress depends on data, speed of learning, and the ability to make difficult decisions with incomplete information. Over time, it became clear that many social and environmental problems remain unsolved not because solutions don’t exist, but because they are not approached with the same operational rigor.
As in business, progress here depends on alignment across stakeholders, particularly with government, and on the ability to increase the quality and velocity of decisions — while staying flexible enough to adapt when evidence demands it.
Clean Air Requires Product–Market Fit
No product succeeds without genuine demand. Clean air presents a paradox: it is universally valued, yet for years the demand remained diffuse, emotional, and largely unmeasured. Without structure, it could not translate into sustained advocacy or systemic change.
We therefore began with a fundamental step — measuring demand. Through one of the first large-scale sociological studies in Almaty, we surveyed residents about air quality, health concerns, perceived risks, and how pollution influences long-term life decisions.
This work gave us something essential: a clear baseline. We could see which groups are most affected, how concerns differ across demographics, and why air quality has become a decisive factor for many families considering whether to stay in the city. Today, one in four residents cites air quality as a reason to consider leaving.
At that point, the conversation changed. Air quality stopped being an abstract concern and became a strategic issue — tied to quality of life, economic competitiveness, and human capital retention. That is what product–market fit looks like in this context.
Data as Proof of Concept
The research confirmed another insight: trust depends on transparency. People want clean air, but they also want credible, understandable data.
We needed the same clarity internally. In technology, decisions unsupported by evidence rarely scale.

At the presentationof the air quality monitoring sensor installation project:
Nurlan Smagulov, Zhuldyz Saulebekova, Arsen Tomsky, Kairat Akhmetov.
That is why one of our earliest priorities was building one of the largest independent air-quality monitoring networks in the region, launching an open dashboard, and developing independent emissions modeling. These tools allow us to move beyond disagreement and toward a shared, evidence-based understanding of reality.
To this day, expert views on pollution sources in Almaty differ, and official data does not always command full confidence within the professional community. From an operational standpoint, this lack of diagnostic clarity is a critical constraint. You cannot manage what you cannot see — particularly in a politically sensitive domain.
From Isolated Measures to System Design
A common pitfall in complex systems is the search for a single, universal solution — a technological “silver bullet” or a visually compelling intervention. Such measures may be well-intentioned, but they often substitute activity for impact.
Global experience is instructive. In India, air-quality policy has at times focused on highly visible, symbolic actions that were easy to communicate but disconnected from the largest sources of emissions. The result was not failure, but limited progress.

At the presentation of the AAI Dashboard.
China followed a different path. Decision-makers applied a principle familiar to any senior executive: identify the few variables that drive the majority of outcomes, and concentrate effort there.
Through modeling and data analysis, three primary sources were prioritized — household fuel use, industry and power generation, and transport. Instead of isolated actions, a coordinated strategy followed: household fuel transitions, industrial and power-plant modernization, and large-scale transport electrification. These decisions were complex, costly, and politically challenging — but they delivered measurable results.
This sequence — diagnosis, prioritization, disciplined execution — is how large systems change.
AIR–TARGET
From the outset, I was deliberate about what Almaty Air Initiative should focus on — and what it should not. There are countless worthy initiatives in environmental work, but impact at scale requires a clear decision framework.
That framework is AIR–TARGET.
AIR defines where we concentrate effort:
Awareness — building informed public demand rooted in health and lived experience.
Infrastructure — enabling structural changes in energy, transport, construction, and heating.
Regulation — embedding progress through enforceable, evidence-based policy.
If an initiative does not strengthen at least one of these pillars, we do not pursue it — regardless of how compelling it may appear publicly.

Air Quality data in the MyCar App.
TARGET defines how we scale:
Technology — our primary scaling tool. Data, dense sensor networks, AI, and modeling allow us to diagnose problems accurately, test scenarios, and replicate solutions at city scale. Technology turns local insights into system-wide decisions.
Art — a high-leverage distribution channel. Cultural projects and visual language make complex issues visible and emotionally accessible, helping ideas spread faster and resonate beyond expert circles.
Research — the foundation of credibility. Applied research replaces assumptions with evidence and ensures that scaling is based on rigor, not intuition.
Governance — the mechanism of permanence. By aligning incentives across institutions and embedding solutions into policy, we ensure that impact survives beyond individual projects.
Education — the engine of sustained demand. Education converts awareness into informed behavior and long-term public support for structural change.
Trends & Media — the amplifier. Media and trend dynamics allow ideas, data, and solutions to travel quickly and reach scale, keeping air quality in the public conversation over time.

At a meeting with the Speaker of the Senate of Parliament, Maulen Ashimbayev.
The Team Is the Advantage
In technology, it is well understood that strategies evolve and products change, but teams determine outcomes.
I built Almaty Air Initiative with that principle in mind. We do not hire by discipline alone. We assemble an interdisciplinary team capable of working across data, technology, research, communications, and public policy — with accountability for results, not just activity.
Equally important is culture. Integrity, independence, and resilience matter. In air quality, progress is incremental and long-term; there are no shortcuts.

With part of the team at the premiere of “Mstitelder”.
As in technology, the team is the primary multiplier of impact.
Closing Perspective
My background outside environmental science allows me to approach this challenge with a different lens. What matters is not the path into this field, but the ability to deliver solutions that protect health and secure the future of the next generation.
I remain a technology executive — I have simply changed the object of scale. Instead of companies, the focus is impact. The tools remain the same: data, systems, people, speed, and prioritization. Only the success metric changes.
At scale, success means healthier lives and more resilient cities. In economic terms, it means investment attractiveness, talent retention, and positioning Almaty as a city where innovation and quality of life reinforce each other.

At Digital Bridge 2025.
When complex public challenges are addressed with the same rigor and ambition as technology, transformation becomes possible.
In technology, this is called hyper-growth.
At Almaty Air Initiative, we call it hyper-impact.